Motorcyclist Daniel Robins' death on A31 'a tragic accident' following pony crash

Daniel Robins

Daniel Robins

First published in News
Last updated
Daily Echo: Photograph of the Author by , Senior Reporter

THE death of a motorcyclist killed after colliding with a stray New Forest pony was a “tragic accident”, a coroner concluded today.

Southampton Coroners Court heard how Daniel Robins was one of two riders who were in collision with the animal on the westbound A31 at Picket Post near Ringwood.

The 31-year-old former Hardley School pupil was pronounced dead at the Royal Bournemouth Hospital.

Concluding the inquest, coroner Grahame Short, said Mr Robins had died an accidental death.

It came after a day long inquest Southampton Coroners Court which heard how police initially closed the entire A31 after the wild horse was spotted by PC Kevin Pearson - but then reopened the road after failing to spot it.

The inquest heard how the horse had wandered more than one mile beyond a lane that was coned off.

Speaking at the inquest Daniel's mum Lorna Robins said that the horse should have been found before the road was reopened.

The court heard how after 40 minutes PC Pearson lost sight of the chestnut brown pony after it vanished into undergrowth.

Meanwhile, with both lanes shut just after 5pm, rush hour traffic was building up as police officers struggled to locate the horse.

The court heard how police then decided to reopen the outer lane of the dual carriageway while shutting off the inner road for half a mile.

PC Pearson said: "Unfortunately we had to make a decision. We had to make a decision to allow traffic to flow. We could not keep the road closed indefinitely."

A police helicopter was requested but the control room did not call for one, the inquest was told.

But unbeknown to the police officers the horse had strayed further than the coned off area, the inquest heard.

In fact the court was told that the horse was in the middle of the road some 1.1mile from the end of the closed off lane.

Before the collision at about 6.15pm on January 22, but Mr Robins and the other rider Ian Woolgar, 47, from Broadstone, had ridden to the front of the stopped traffic.

When the outer lane was reopened the two set off, with Mr Robins ahead.

Mr Robins then struck the horse which was standing in the centre of the road. This flung the animal into the path of Mr Woolgar who also hit it.

As previously reported, the incident saw hundreds of drivers left stranded in their cars on the A31 with no food or water or access to toilets.

The accident probe also looked at both bikes and there were no defects and the weather and road conditions were good.

Mr Robins had no drugs or alcohol in his blood stream.

It was unclear whether he had his full beam on, although it was switched on after the impact.

Members of the public and then PC Rebecca Stark, the first officer on the scene, tried in vain to revive Mr Robins.

PC Stark said she had spoken to Mr Robins just minutes before at the top of the road block warning him of a horse in the road.

The investigation could not determined the speed he was travelling.

A post mortem found he died from multiple injuries to the body and the head.

Mr Woolgar suffered broken bones and cuts to his liver and kidney.

Concluding the inquest, coroner Grahame Short, said Mr Robins had died an accidental death.

The inquest also heard from Mr Robin's mum, Lorna. She asked why the rolling road block had not been extended to five miles to allow for the animal roaming.

Mrs Robins said: My son would be alive today if that happened.

"I know that horses can travel far."

But speaking afterwards, she told the Daily Echo  the horse should have been found before the road was reopened.

She said: “You can't make assumptions like that especially when life's in danger.

“I just feel given it could a life and death situation they should have erred on the side of caution.

She added: “Why there was not a slow rolling start done?”

Comments (9)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

8:03pm Mon 30 Jun 14

Huey says...

Horses should be banned from being kept near roads. No real need for them in the 21st century anyway.
Horses should be banned from being kept near roads. No real need for them in the 21st century anyway. Huey
  • Score: -8

8:57pm Mon 30 Jun 14

BeyondImagination says...

Huey wrote:
Horses should be banned from being kept near roads. No real need for them in the 21st century anyway.
Horses are an essential feature of the New Forest. Unfortunately they, like deer and pedestrians get onto the road and are involved in accidents.
[quote][p][bold]Huey[/bold] wrote: Horses should be banned from being kept near roads. No real need for them in the 21st century anyway.[/p][/quote]Horses are an essential feature of the New Forest. Unfortunately they, like deer and pedestrians get onto the road and are involved in accidents. BeyondImagination
  • Score: 7

11:44pm Mon 30 Jun 14

sparkster says...

sorry Idont see how you can ban horses, if you ban horses there would be no such things as horse racing, there are things that should be banned in the 21st century but horses arent one of them, I agree with BeyondImagination there are times when animals do get on the roads and you cant very well ban deer or cows
sorry Idont see how you can ban horses, if you ban horses there would be no such things as horse racing, there are things that should be banned in the 21st century but horses arent one of them, I agree with BeyondImagination there are times when animals do get on the roads and you cant very well ban deer or cows sparkster
  • Score: 3

12:23am Tue 1 Jul 14

BeyondImagination says...

Huey wrote:
Horses should be banned from being kept near roads. No real need for them in the 21st century anyway.
Roads should be banned where there are horses.
[quote][p][bold]Huey[/bold] wrote: Horses should be banned from being kept near roads. No real need for them in the 21st century anyway.[/p][/quote]Roads should be banned where there are horses. BeyondImagination
  • Score: 6

7:02am Tue 1 Jul 14

Zexagon says...

Huey should be banned where there are computers
Huey should be banned where there are computers Zexagon
  • Score: 3

8:23am Tue 1 Jul 14

biggus2 says...

Rule 126 of the Highway Code "You must be able to stop in the distance you can see to be clear. rule 125 extra care should be taken at night. Very Tragic as all the fatal collisions are but drivers and riders must take responsibility for their own welfare. You cant blame the police for an animal in the road. In the New Forest it happens on numerous occasions where vehicles come into conflict with the animals. Its not just the New Forest either take the A3 at Butser for example. lots of animal deaths. Very Tragic for the families involved. Yes there are no toilets or refreshments on that stretch of road until you get to Burley so where do you get them from any suggestions.
Rule 126 of the Highway Code "You must be able to stop in the distance you can see to be clear. rule 125 extra care should be taken at night. Very Tragic as all the fatal collisions are but drivers and riders must take responsibility for their own welfare. You cant blame the police for an animal in the road. In the New Forest it happens on numerous occasions where vehicles come into conflict with the animals. Its not just the New Forest either take the A3 at Butser for example. lots of animal deaths. Very Tragic for the families involved. Yes there are no toilets or refreshments on that stretch of road until you get to Burley so where do you get them from any suggestions. biggus2
  • Score: 1

11:01am Tue 1 Jul 14

S!monOn says...

biggus2 wrote:
Rule 126 of the Highway Code "You must be able to stop in the distance you can see to be clear. rule 125 extra care should be taken at night. Very Tragic as all the fatal collisions are but drivers and riders must take responsibility for their own welfare. You cant blame the police for an animal in the road. In the New Forest it happens on numerous occasions where vehicles come into conflict with the animals. Its not just the New Forest either take the A3 at Butser for example. lots of animal deaths. Very Tragic for the families involved. Yes there are no toilets or refreshments on that stretch of road until you get to Burley so where do you get them from any suggestions.
"Yes there are no toilets or refreshments on that stretch of road until you get to Burley so where do you get them from any suggestions."
[quote][p][bold]biggus2[/bold] wrote: Rule 126 of the Highway Code "You must be able to stop in the distance you can see to be clear. rule 125 extra care should be taken at night. Very Tragic as all the fatal collisions are but drivers and riders must take responsibility for their own welfare. You cant blame the police for an animal in the road. In the New Forest it happens on numerous occasions where vehicles come into conflict with the animals. Its not just the New Forest either take the A3 at Butser for example. lots of animal deaths. Very Tragic for the families involved. Yes there are no toilets or refreshments on that stretch of road until you get to Burley so where do you get them from any suggestions.[/p][/quote]"Yes there are no toilets or refreshments on that stretch of road until you get to Burley so where do you get them from any suggestions." S!monOn
  • Score: 0

11:36am Tue 1 Jul 14

camerajuan says...

BeyondImagination wrote:
Huey wrote:
Horses should be banned from being kept near roads. No real need for them in the 21st century anyway.
Roads should be banned where there are horses.
Care to explain how you would implement that scheme?

Ridiculous statement to make. Can you imagine the traffic on the alternative roads?? There's enough whinging about that already!
[quote][p][bold]BeyondImagination[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Huey[/bold] wrote: Horses should be banned from being kept near roads. No real need for them in the 21st century anyway.[/p][/quote]Roads should be banned where there are horses.[/p][/quote]Care to explain how you would implement that scheme? Ridiculous statement to make. Can you imagine the traffic on the alternative roads?? There's enough whinging about that already! camerajuan
  • Score: -1

12:47pm Tue 1 Jul 14

sparkster says...

I agree, a ridiculous statement, next it will be ban cows deer etc I can think of things to ban in the 21st century and horses arent one of them
I agree, a ridiculous statement, next it will be ban cows deer etc I can think of things to ban in the 21st century and horses arent one of them sparkster
  • Score: 0

Comments are closed on this article.

Send us your news, pictures and videos

Most read stories

Local Info

Enter your postcode, town or place name

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree